Partisipasi Dalam Kerangka Program Pemolisian Masyarakat Menuju Masyarakat Aman: Tinjauan Naratif

TINJAUAN NARATIF

Authors

  • Indra Pratama Putra Salmon Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33830/jiapi.v3i2.107

Keywords:

Safe Society, Modernization, Community Policing, public participation

Abstract

The development of modernization and global dynamics basically brings a comprehensive impact on the socio-economic and cultural life of the community. In addition to being a shared goal, it also has a negative impact on society. This study uses a literature study methodology with a narrative analysis approach. The study uses data, theoretical literature, and previous studies as strengths in writing analysis. The results of the study show that technological developments have both positive and negative impacts on society, such as poverty, inequality, and other social ills. The impact was running which initially took place in urban areas, then continued in rural areas considering the trends that occurred in urban areas began to enter and develop in rural areas. On the other hand, the limitations of stakeholders (in this case the police) demand synergy with groups outside of these stakeholders, which in this case is the involvement of the community to contribute to creating stability, security and environmental order. In this regard, the community policing strategy becomes an alternative in overcoming and overcoming disturbances and threats to security and public order. The urgency and contribution of this study is that it is important to carry out community policing efforts to overcome criminal acts and even crimes in the community that can cause losses and damage in practice.

References

Adnyana, I. B. N. P, & Setiabudhi, I. K. R. (2020). Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan (Studi di Wilayah Hukum Polisi Resor Kota Mataram). Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(7), 1079-1091.https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ kerthasemaya/article/view/61882.

Arief, B. N. (1998). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arisukwu, O., Igbolekwu, C., Oye, J., Oyeyipo, E., Asamu, F., Rasak, B., & Oyekola, I. (2020). Community participation in crime prevention and control in rural Nigeria. Heliyon, 6(9), e05015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05015.

Blumer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bosu, B. (1982). Sendi-Sendi Kriminologi. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Ceccato, V. (2015). Rural Crime and Community Safety (1st edition). United Kingdom: Routledge.

Cook, P. J. (2009). Crime Control in the City: A Research-Based Briefing on Public and Private Measures. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 11(1), 53-79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20868690.

Ghani, Z. A. (2017). A comparative study of urban crime between Malaysia and Nigeria. Journal of Urban Management, 6(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2017.03.001

Kaylen, M. T., & Pridemore, W. A. (2013). Social Disorganization And Crime In Rural Communities: The First Direct Test of the Systemic Model. The British Journal of Criminology, 53(5), 905-923. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23639796.

Kennedy, L. W., Caplan, J. M., Piza, E. L., & Thomas, A. L. (2021). Environmental Factors Influencing Urban Homicide Clearance Rates: A Spatial Analysis of New York City. Homicide Studies, 25(4), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767920976183

Kontan. (2021). Kilas Kementerian: Saatnya Gali Potensi Positif Media Sosial sebagai “Pintu Kemana Saja”. https://kilaskementerian.kontan.co.id/news/saatnya-gali-potensi-positif-media-sosial-sebagai-pintu-ke-mana-saja.

McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., & Fang, H. (2010). The cost of crime to society: new crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug Alcohol Depend., 108(1-2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.002.

Mesko, G. (2020). Rural Crimilology: A Chellenge for The Future. European Journal Of Crime, Criminal Law And Criminal Justice, 28, 3-13.

Naude, W. (2021). Sisi Buruk Artificial Intelligence di Balik Potensi Bisnis Besar. Katadata. https://katadata.co.id/muchamadnafi/indepth/614dda21c7686/sisi-buruk-artificial-intelligence-di-balik-potensi-bisnis-besar.

Priyanto, A. (2012). Kriminologi.Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Rifa’i, E. (2018). Model Pelaksanaan Pemolisian Masyarakat (Polmas) oleh FKPM dalam Menciptakan Kamtibmas di Kota Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Cepalo, 2(1), 43-54.

Tadie, J. (2009). Wilayah Kekerasan di Jakarta. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu.

Towers, S., Chen, S., Malik, A., & Ebert, D. (2018). Factors influencing temporal patterns in crime in a large American city: A predictive analytics perspective. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0205151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205151.

Tutrianto, R. (2018). Munculnya Kejahahatan di Wilayah Perkotaan (Studi pada Kota Pekanbaru). Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 14(1), 15-24. http://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/jki/article/view/9674/67546050.

Younes, M. B., & Al-Zoubi, S. (2015). The Impact of Technologies on Society: A Review. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science, 20(2), 82-86.

https://pusiknas.polri.go.id/data_kejahatan.

Published

2022-12-13

How to Cite

Salmon, I. P. P. (2022). Partisipasi Dalam Kerangka Program Pemolisian Masyarakat Menuju Masyarakat Aman: Tinjauan Naratif: TINJAUAN NARATIF. JIAPI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Pemerintahan Indonesia, 3(2), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.33830/jiapi.v3i2.107

Issue

Section

Articles