Konstruksi Organisasi melalui Perspektif Collaborative Governance


  • Akadun STIA Sebelas April Sumedang




collaborative governance, forum, hybrid, organization


Systematic Literature Review aims to carry out organizational construction according to collaborative governance. The organizational structure of collaborative governance is hybrid. Forums can be networked or virtual, even though the secretariat is accommodated in an adhoc structure. In public sector organizations, governmental organizations replicatively use line and staff structures. In private sector organizations, a company may use a functional, divisional, matrix, network, or virtual structure. In the organizational structure of collaborative governance, the important elements in designing an organization, including the division of labor, departmentalization, chain of command, span of control, decision-making models, and formalization, really depend on the organizational structure whether it is adhoc, network, or virtual.


Ansell, C., and Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Balogh, S., Emerson, K., and Nabatchi, T. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22(1), 1–29.

Chotray, V., and Stoker, G. (2009). Governance: From theory to practice. In Governance Theory and Practice (hlm. 214–247). Springer.

Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., and Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen?centered collaborative public management. Public administration review, 66, 76–88.

Cordery, J. L. (2004). Another Case of the Emperor’snew Clothes? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.1348/0963179042596432

Davis, G., and Keating, M. (1993). The Future of Governance: Policy Choices. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Evi Triandini and others, ‘Metode Systematic Literature Review Untuk Identifikasi Platform Dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Di Indonesia’, Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1.2 (2019), 63 <https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916>.

Farazmand, A., and Carter, R. (2004). Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations. Portsmouth: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Fosler, R. S. (2002). Working better together: How government, business, and nonprofit organizations can achieve public purposes through cross-sector collaboration, alliances, and partnerships: Executive summary. Washington DC: Independent Sector.

Gandara, Gagan (2018). Struktur Organisasi Pada Sebuah Kantor Perwakilan Perusahaan Layanan Konten Video Pendek Berbasis Aplikasi Bergerak, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gagan_Gandara/publication/348445650_Struktur_Organisasi_Pada_Kantor_Perwakilan_Perusahaan_Layanan_Konten_Aplikasi_Video_Pendek/links/5fffc9d9299bf1408893da86/Struktur-Organisasi-Pada-Kantor-Perwakilan-Perusahaan-Layanan-Konten-Aplikasi-Video-Pendek.pdf (diakses pada 29 Mei 2023).

Hartman, C. L., Hofman, P. S., and Stafford, E. R. (2002). Environmental Collaboration. In Potential and Limits (hlm. 21–40). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kooiman, J. (2003). Societal governance. In Demokratien in Europa (hlm. 229–250). Springer.

Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., and Miller, R. (2001). Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179–205.

Linden, R. (2002). A Framework for Collaborating.(Partnerships and Networks). The Public Manager, 31(2), 3.

Munaf, Y. (2017). Network Pattern of Regional Election Commission (KPUD) Pekanbaru City Increasing Political Participation in Society. International Conference on Democracy, Accountability and Governance (ICODAG 2017). Atlantis Press.

Munro, E. R. (2008). Research governance, ethics and access: A case study illustrating the new challenges facing social researchers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 429–439.

Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., and Knops, A. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of social policy, 33(2), 203–223.

O’Flynn, J. (2008). Elusive appeal or aspirational ideal? The rhetoric and reality of the ‘collaborative turn’in public policy. Collaborative Governance: A new era of public policy in Australia, 181–195.

O’Leary, R. (2014). Collaborative governance in New Zealand: Important choices ahead. New Zealand: Fulbright.

Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction the (New) Public Governance: a suitable case for treatment? In The new public governance? (hlm. 17–32). Routledge.

Provan, K. G., and Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229–252.

Raharja, S. D. (2008). Pendekatan Kolaboratif Dalam Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran SungaiCitarum. Disertasi Doktor Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Indonesia. Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia.

Rogahang, H. (2019). Pengaruh Struktur Organisasi dan Tim Proses Terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Kepala Sekolah, Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, Vol 21, No. 3 (2019).

Strauss, D. (2002). How to make collaboration work. California.

Sullivan, H., and Skelcher, C. (2002). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. London: Palgrave.




How to Cite

Akadun. (2023). Konstruksi Organisasi melalui Perspektif Collaborative Governance. JIAPI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Pemerintahan Indonesia, 4(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.33830/jiapi.v4i1.119